Footbasket: Sam Bradford’s Farcical Deal Means NFL Needs Rookie Salary Cap

Can words be used to describe for the largest deal in NFL history for a rookie?
And by that, I mean, in guaranteed money. If you thought the last few years were getting out of control (Matthew Stafford’s deal and JaMarcus Russell’s), then you have seen nothing yet.
ProFootballTalk.com has been told that the deal for the number one overall pick for Sam Bradford is legit. Yes, it comes with 50 million dollars in guaranteed money “That’s $8.3 million more in guaranteed money than the first overall pick received in 2009, an increase of 19.9 percent.”
I am by no means upset that Bradford and his agent went out and got him this kind of deal. A deal that has put me over the edge to the current situation.
A rookie cap is needed in the NFL.
Agents are taking advantage of these teams that have no choice but to give whatever it takes to ensure*that their top selection signs.
Let’s reflect here. 50 million dollars to a guy who has never played in a pro system in college, has a very fragile body (injured his shoulder easily), and most importantly, has never taken a snap on the NFL level?
Something has to give. I mean, the NBA installed a hard rookie cap, and it has been one of the best ideas they have made in quite some time.
As the NFL looks toward 18-game seasons and harder penalties for NFL convicts, a rookie cap needs to be higher on the agenda. Many experts feel it is a top priority to put in a cap by 2011. I sure hope so.
For a moment, let’s ignore that Bradford’s new deal will make him more money then Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, and Drew Brees.
How about the players that are attempting to get raises, but are getting different treatment from their front offices? Players such as Vincent Jackson, Chris Johnson, Andre Johnson, and Darrelle Revis are among the many stars who have delivered on the biggest stage.
They deserve a raise over unproven rookies.
Josh Dhani, Footbasket
http://forums.sportsjabber.net/sjforums/showthread.php?t=60079




Leave a Reply